Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Bolt on 5.0, beats 4th gen 427 stroker camaro SS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2014, 09:59 AM
  #641  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by R6cowboy
Originally Posted by "MAC"
Your wanting to compare a 5.4L to the ls1...

Stop tryn to twist **** and stop crying.... be a man and take it. That 5.4L is comparable to the ls7.

But because you wanna twist **** and make comparisons that shouldn't be compared im still waiting on you to tell me how great the 5.4L is compared to the 572?
Not starting an argument. What's wrong with comparing the 5.4L modular to the 5.7L LS1?
Btw, I'm not a Ford guy. I'm just a car guy with no loyalty to a certain brand.
Bc its not comparable its like comparing a vette to a mustang or the gt500 to a v6 camaro. OHC engines rev higher in rpm's and they typically have small displacements ie the mustang engines 4.6,5.0,5.4 and 5.8..... like i said before the 5.4 and the ls7 is the correct comparison. Gm and Ford have different ways to get the same hp. GM is using 54-55 design engine and Ford is using a more modern technology and yet GM is still doing very well competing with the mustangs, and with the vette it is still able to compete with cars outside its class hell the 13+gt500 does as well. And yet the stuck up europeans think america can't build proper cars lol
"MAC" is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 10:06 AM
  #642  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
R6cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 835
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Mac, OHC V8 technology was installed in domestic cars in the early '60s, maybe even earlier then that.
R6cowboy is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 10:10 AM
  #643  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Islander just think about it ford uses an OHC engine which is able to rev higher thus making more power with less cubes. Hell the Ferrari 458 is making damn near 500hp with less cubes than an ls7 vette and with less cubes than the 4.6Las well

HP = trq ×rpm/5250

http://www.reliance.com/mtr/flaclcmn.htm

So if you can rev higher you make more power
"MAC" is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 10:11 AM
  #644  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by R6cowboy
Mac, OHC V8 technology was installed in domestic cars in the early '60s, maybe even earlier then that.
Thats why i said the V8 is a 1954 to 1955 design...
"MAC" is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 10:11 AM
  #645  
ASSuming On The Tree
 
audacious nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Mercedes v8>American v8
audacious nick is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 10:18 AM
  #646  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

OHC design is older than the OHV design, Mac.
Irunelevens is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 10:19 AM
  #647  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by "MAC"
Islander just think about it ford uses an OHC engine which is able to rev higher thus making more power with less cubes. Hell the Ferrari 458 is making damn near 500hp with less cubes than an ls7 vette and with less cubes than the 4.6Las well

HP = trq ×rpm/5250

http://www.reliance.com/mtr/flaclcmn.htm

So if you can rev higher you make more power
GM makes power the way they want to and Ferrari does it the way they want to.

One uses cubes and the other one uses technology. There is give and take between both methods.

So, are you saying that it isn't fair to GM?
islander033 is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 10:25 AM
  #648  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No islander i aint all im saying is displacement is a mute point now a days this isnt the 60s 70s or 80s any more where you truly needed more displacement to get more hp. And ive been say GM and Ford has different ways to get the same hp
"MAC" is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 10:30 AM
  #649  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ZNix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plympton, MA
Posts: 193
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by islander033
GM makes power the way they want to and Ferrari does it the way they want to.

One uses cubes and the other one uses technology. There is give and take between both methods.

So, are you saying that it isn't fair to GM?
I think Islander has the right mind set. Each company will make power how they want. Every engine has its strengths and weaknesses due to these preferences. We should just appreciate all engines equally and respect car guys whether or not they follow one engine or the other. Tolerance.
ZNix is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 10:35 AM
  #650  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ive been saying what islander just said but i definitely agree with what you said ZNix
"MAC" is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 10:43 AM
  #651  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
OHC design is older than the OHV design, Mac.
I didnt know that buy im just doing what your ford bros like to do..that is make it seem like their engine is at a disadvantage. You just catch things a lot better than some GM guys

It first debut in 1912 Peugeot is that what your talking about?
"MAC" is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 10:55 AM
  #652  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by "MAC"
Ive been saying what islander just said but i definitely agree with what you said ZNix
Not sure what you are arguing about then.

PS. If an engine can make the same or more HP with less cubes, then isn't it more efficient?
islander033 is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 11:27 AM
  #653  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes it is more efficient and you know exactly what im arguing. I have been saying what you have been saying. Idk why your arguing with it. My argument with Auto is that he shouldn't compare the gt500 engine (with out the s/c) to the 4th gen SS. It should be compared to the Z28 engine. Its just like when you ford guys got all butt hurt when i compared the zr1 to the 13 gt500 considering they make roughly the same power and yet yall said that wasn't fair nor a correct comparison. Well auto is wrong on his comparison get over it. It goes both ways you can not make up stipulations that make ford always win in the end. But again we could talk about just how good Ford is doing in the pro racing leagues ie NASCAR, LE MANS, NHRA DRAG RACING etc... if you want

Last edited by "MAC"; 03-03-2014 at 11:53 AM.
"MAC" is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 11:30 AM
  #654  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Which btw islander ford is loosing badly in NASCAR, and the LE MANS but ford beats GM in the Drag racing department with the Cobra Jet vs COPO which ill give you that but idk why they dont use the 572 or a 632 after all its a fn drag race and they have the money to do it!!!!!
"MAC" is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 12:05 PM
  #655  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Lawhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: \
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Some here have said that if you have two cars, the car you don't drive in the rain automatically becomes a race car...
Yeah that's what Hio told me

Don't drive your car in the rain = race car

God forbid I don't want the idiots on the road running into me when I have a car that's more expendable Hio is just that but hurt my car is 10 times the street car his is lol
Lawhead is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 12:15 PM
  #656  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
So your point s what......It takes a built stroked 5.4 to do what a stock or cam only ls7 can do? I would also say your talking out your *** on the pump gas part. You're starting to show your inexperience.

You like them so well go buy one and build it. That's where **** gets real. All these guys on here yakkin have not did that yet. Put you money where your mouth is.

Auto showed he couldn't. He jumped ship on that pos n/a 4.6 he was building........He was gonna wear me out with it too. So far his boosted 5.4 has yet to wear me out. That's the proof I see.
Yawn. Little man syndrome ftl.

My old motor is still going to out et the racecar ls6

I have had the car for ~15 months and it is already faster then your racecar camero.
automach1 is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 12:21 PM
  #657  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by "MAC"
Yes it is more efficient and you know exactly what im arguing. I have been saying what you have been saying. Idk why your arguing with it. My argument with Auto is that he shouldn't compare the gt500 engine (with out the s/c) to the 4th gen SS. It should be compared to the Z28 engine. Its just like when you ford guys got all butt hurt when i compared the zr1 to the 13 gt500 considering they make roughly the same power and yet yall said that wasn't fair nor a correct comparison. Well auto is wrong on his comparison get over it. It goes both ways you can not make up stipulations that make ford always win in the end. But again we could talk about just how good Ford is doing in the pro racing leagues ie NASCAR, LE MANS, NHRA DRAG RACING etc... if you want
TL: DR: NFG
Originally Posted by "MAC"
..... ford beats GM in the Drag racing department with the Cobra Jet vs COPO which ill give you that but idk why they dont use the 572 or a 632 after all its a fn drag race and they have the money to do it!!!!!
Has to do with classes, nothing else.
islander033 is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 12:46 PM
  #658  
Teching In
 
Gt4urass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Orlando
Posts: 5
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If you're truly trying to keep stipulations out of the argument, then why do you insist upon "stipulating" that a 330ci be compared against a 427ci engine? Displacement is ALL that matters in the argument of output efficiency. I think you may be missing the point...a lot of points actually...
Gt4urass is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 12:59 PM
  #659  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
"MAC"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gt4urass
If you're truly trying to keep stipulations out of the argument, then why do you insist upon "stipulating" that a 330ci be compared against a 427ci engine? Displacement is ALL that matters in the argument of output efficiency. I think you may be missing the point...a lot of points actually...
Actually your missing the point 5th gen Camaro uses the LS3/L99 Ford uses the 5.0 both cars compete and both engines compete. 4th gen Camaro uses th Ls1/ls6/lt1/lt4, Ford mustang uses the 4.6L like i said the 5.4L is compared to the LS7
"MAC" is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 01:01 PM
  #660  
Teching In
 
Gt4urass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Orlando
Posts: 5
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by "MAC"
Actually your missing the point 5th gen Camaro uses the LS3/L99 Ford uses the 5.0 both cars compete and both engines compete. 4th gen Camaro uses th Ls1/ls6/lt1/lt4, Ford mustang uses the 4.6L like i said the 5.4L is compared to the LS7
Just...wow. You make my brain hurt.
Gt4urass is offline  


Quick Reply: Bolt on 5.0, beats 4th gen 427 stroker camaro SS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 AM.