Bolt on 5.0, beats 4th gen 427 stroker camaro SS
03-04-2014, 06:53 PM
#743
7 Second Club
03-04-2014, 06:56 PM
#744
ASSuming On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It'd be less sad and more understandable if he were making low 500s to the wheel. On street tires
03-04-2014, 10:15 PM
#746
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And I haven't seen anybody that wasn't a retard try to "bash the LSx."
03-04-2014, 10:34 PM
#747
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Law -only quoted you cause you quoted Hihoe and I saw my name.
Yes I do plan on going boosted. But since you appear to know why, then can you tell me?
Tells me you can't get to where you want to go n/a.
With the setup that it has (low comp for n/a and blower cams) it will go low 11's with the worst modular 4v head ever made (came with the car btw). By switching to 03/04 style heads, I'd pick up another 2-3 tenths.
So now low compression is almost 10:1
.....that's what you said you had. Not realy what I consider low comp.....but not high either.
I know of 2 n/a 5.4 motors that went low 9's n/a. Can you show me the same for an LSx? Keep in mind my examples did it with less than 333 cubes. I haven't seen a 346 go low 9's n/a. All the ones I have seen are bigger.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-raci...ck-ci-h-c.html
Yeah bolt-on, FP T56, swiss cheese'd car gives us wood. Please don't flatter yourself. The guy with the vette with the same setup as you has gone over 7 tenths faster. I'd be livid if my car didn't run 10's with 130 traps...N/A, FI, electric powered, Fred Flinstone powered, whatever. Street car or not. That Supra excuse territory. Your car is more of a racecar than mine. Why does every car have to have OEM parts to gain your respect? So I take it you despise NHRA TF, FC, and Prostock?
Everyone would like you much better if you got off that pedestal that you think you have/deserve.
Yes I do plan on going boosted. But since you appear to know why, then can you tell me?
Tells me you can't get to where you want to go n/a.
With the setup that it has (low comp for n/a and blower cams) it will go low 11's with the worst modular 4v head ever made (came with the car btw). By switching to 03/04 style heads, I'd pick up another 2-3 tenths.
So now low compression is almost 10:1
.....that's what you said you had. Not realy what I consider low comp.....but not high either.I know of 2 n/a 5.4 motors that went low 9's n/a. Can you show me the same for an LSx? Keep in mind my examples did it with less than 333 cubes. I haven't seen a 346 go low 9's n/a. All the ones I have seen are bigger.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-raci...ck-ci-h-c.html
Yeah bolt-on, FP T56, swiss cheese'd car gives us wood.
Please don't flatter yourself. The guy with the vette with the same setup as you has gone over 7 tenths faster. I'd be livid if my car didn't run 10's with 130 traps...N/A, FI, electric powered, Fred Flinstone powered, whatever. Street car or not. That Supra excuse territory. Your car is more of a racecar than mine. Why does every car have to have OEM parts to gain your respect? So I take it you despise NHRA TF, FC, and Prostock? Everyone would like you much better if you got off that pedestal that you think you have/deserve.
I would be livid if my built engine gutted slick tired race car was so awful I had to shoot for low 11's. Hell I would kick the windsheild out.....beat it with a sledge hammer and send it to china to get recycled.
So a complete car that is heavier than yours with fenderliners, ac, cruise, street tires and all is more of a race car than your built engine slick tired car.......hhhmmm. Is that because it's faster?
If I'm not then he must be the biggest ***** ever. Not the first time he has made comments about me while being on his ignore list.
The worst part is I thought Bitemark was alright.
Fixed it for ya.
03-04-2014, 10:50 PM
#748
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
You missed that it still has a ls1 intake and it's full weight other than the big/littles. Even has shitty pacesetter headers.......and a shitty chambered muffler.
You act like it's a full drag suspension.......didn't you notice the pic of him autoxing the car?.....I guess not.
That car has the potential to go .2-.4 faster easily. Did you notice it was his dd to?
03-04-2014, 10:58 PM
#749
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Who said anything about him "maxing out" that car? You said a Mach 1 would have to leave hard to run a number close to that. I pointed out that he is very obviously also leaving pretty damn hard.
03-04-2014, 11:08 PM
#750
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
No....you tried to discredit the car and I 
you on it.
It also reads like it's still on a 10bolt.
Do you really think a mack 1 would get near that @ full weight? Do you think a mack 1 is gonna run near that w/o maxing it out?
you on it.It also reads like it's still on a 10bolt.
Do you really think a mack 1 would get near that @ full weight? Do you think a mack 1 is gonna run near that w/o maxing it out?
03-04-2014, 11:12 PM
#751
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh I'd love to see where that happened. Please, go ahead and quote where I tried to discredit the car.
03-04-2014, 11:26 PM
#752
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
The car you posted up has a built rear-end, suspension work, a built transmission w/ a 4,000rpm stall, and bigs/littles...do you think he's babying it off the line?
I type pretty fast...it doesn't take me very long. And I haven't seen anybody that wasn't a retard try to "bash the LSx."
I type pretty fast...it doesn't take me very long.
And I haven't seen anybody that wasn't a retard try to "bash the LSx."
03-04-2014, 11:40 PM
#753
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's a link to a pick'em up truck bolt-on engine in e 4th gen
https://ls1tech.com/forums/vehicle-c...8-hardtop.html
Does anyone here think they can go to a junk yard......pluck a 5.4 out of a 4x4 truck and run the # this guy did?
https://ls1tech.com/forums/vehicle-c...8-hardtop.html
Does anyone here think they can go to a junk yard......pluck a 5.4 out of a 4x4 truck and run the # this guy did?
You don't think a bolt-on/geared/stalled/suspension Mach 1 with a built transmission and a few pounds off the front could run in the 11s? Because that's the same motor that's in the Aviator. The 5.4 out of the Navigator has a little more power and a lot more torque...
03-05-2014, 12:32 AM
#754
Banned
iTrader: (1)
!["MAC"'s Avatar](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 50 50'><circle class='avatar-circle-default' fill='%237f3b59' cx='25px' cy='25px' r='20px'></circle><text class='avatar-text-default' x='49%' y='53%' fill='white' text-anchor='middle' alignment-baseline='middle'>"</text></svg>)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The car you posted up has a built rear-end, suspension work, a built transmission w/ a 4,000rpm stall, and bigs/littles...do you think he's babying it off the line?
I type pretty fast...it doesn't take me very long. And I haven't seen anybody that wasn't a retard try to "bash the LSx."
I type pretty fast...it doesn't take me very long.
And I haven't seen anybody that wasn't a retard try to "bash the LSx."
03-05-2014, 07:47 AM
#758
Irun14.2s, click on the link that doug posted. In that guys sig there is a vid of that very pass. Watch it. Car leaves good but not as hard as you think. Compare it leaving to stoppys pic in his sig and tell me wich car is leaving harder
03-05-2014, 07:57 AM
#759
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Only a dumb **** like you could possibly read the conversation and think that I am the one trying to discredit anything. Let's go back to when you first linked that car;
To which I responded;
Then you said some bullshit about me comparing power instead of ET, and how you didn't think a Ford could do it...just because it's a Ford, basically.
Sure sounds like you're the one trying to discredit there to me. So since you want to try and dog the Mach 1 for having to leave "really really hard," I point out that the Camaro that YOU linked, is also leaving hard.
As in, both cars would be doing work off the line, since they're launching hard at a high rpm with bigs/littles. How is that you think I'm discrediting the car you posted? Because I had the audacity to suggest that a similar Mustang could get close because they would make similar power? How dare I make such accusations
To which I responded;
Then you said some bullshit about me comparing power instead of ET, and how you didn't think a Ford could do it...just because it's a Ford, basically.
Sure sounds like you're the one trying to discredit there to me. So since you want to try and dog the Mach 1 for having to leave "really really hard," I point out that the Camaro that YOU linked, is also leaving hard.
As in, both cars would be doing work off the line, since they're launching hard at a high rpm with bigs/littles. How is that you think I'm discrediting the car you posted? Because I had the audacity to suggest that a similar Mustang could get close because they would make similar power? How dare I make such accusations
If you think one will run with a 6.0lq9 pick up truck engine you're a idiot. The best part is that's not even gm's best pick up truck engine. That car.....of which I have already pointed out things that would help it.......is faster than bitemarks car. With either engine. Now he may be able to his junk to go faster but his car is no where near full weight like that car is.....and it's cammed
But in your true form you want to compare a lightened up ford to a full weight camaro. The best part is you or others cannot accuse me of any tricks......cause it's not even my car.....lmao.
How's that 2v head cam car coming??? lmafo
Funny how there seems to be a double standard.....lol Show's his true character.......or lack of it.
03-05-2014, 08:25 AM
#760
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You: Any of you dumb Ford guys think a Mustang could match this car?
Me: Yeah maybe, these cars seem to be able to make similar power.
You: But you'd have to leave hard! (your typical response)
Me: That guy leaves pretty hard too...
You: Stop trying to discredit the car I posted up to try and discredit all of you!!
Edit: And Bitemark's car is not the car we are talking about. If you want to compare that Camaro to his car, talk to him.