Originally Posted by Bob@BruteSpeed

https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-raci...rocharger.html

&

https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...1sc-today.html

This is from 2009, but shows what a D-1SC can do. Bob

Originally Posted by 98_WS6_M6

Sayin 150-160 is nothing means it's easy to make them go that fast so I would figure that's a bolt on car then. Low 10s stock is good but for the same price I'll stick with my old built LS cars.



No one said they were slow. Post up the person who said they're slow. I couldn't find it. You were the one that said it's nothing for them to trap 150-160 and the fastest gtr list means nothing to me. Those cars have crazy money and time and work in them to run that. Much respect to them for being on the fastest list. Definitely not easy to get on a fastest list for any car IMO.

Just curious. What does your gtr run?



I'm having fun. Figured rotary can school me a little. Like I said earlier, I didn't know it was easy to make them trap 150-160 in the 1/4. Learn something new every day.

Originally Posted by 98_WS6_M6

Those results are awesome Bob! KP is a bad *** for sure. Both those cars are flying! Looks like I got some work to do with my D1 still. Those little D1 Prochargers could do some work.

Originally Posted by speedtigger

Those results are so impressive. I was shocked when I first saw D1 cars make those numbers.

On a side note, I had a nice conversation with Dan Jones at Indy NMCA this year. Interesting guy.

Originally Posted by rotary1307cc

They are so slow!!

http://www.gtrlife.com/forums/topic/...mile-rankings/

I run the same data logger these cars do, I know what the healthy cars do on the street, and it is impressive

Originally Posted by necrocannibal

To be fair most of those cars have built motors, upgraded heads, built trannys, upgraded turbos, custom intercoolers and god knows how much boost. The ones I saw that would be considered ""bolt ons" were running 10s in the 130 mpg range.

Originally Posted by necrocannibal

To be fair most of those cars have built motors, upgraded heads, built trannys, upgraded turbos, custom intercoolers and god knows how much boost. The ones I saw that would be considered ""bolt ons" were running 10s in the 130 mpg range.

Originally Posted by The Alchemist

My car is 100% a street car, but is not a daily driver. I'm in the northeast, and between shitty winters, and horrible roads, the car gets parked from November to March. I only drive the car to work a few times a month, as well as weekend cruises, so yes, that's not a lot of miles on the car, but most of that cruising is with the kids.

And centris are good for wanting a little more than stock???? Really? Damn near 900rwhp on the street is a little more than just 'a little more than stock'.

I like rowing gears, and like the instant power that is there as soon as I let out the clutch with each gear, something that doesn't happen unless you powershift a turbo car.

Originally Posted by rotary1307cc

Lool drag racing is everything isn't it? Loool

Those cars work at everything, road course, half mile, street rolls, and drag

Who gives a **** about price, it doesn't change the fact they are an awesome platform

Originally Posted by rotary1307cc

Are you special?? 135mph car and thinks he knows about GTRs

A simple bolt on 800-1khp gtr will work THE **** out of most turbo cars on this site on the street

With full comforts

Originally Posted by The Alchemist

And centris are good for wanting a little more than stock???? Really? Damn near 900rwhp on the street is a little more than just 'a little more than stock'.

I like rowing gears, and like the instant power that is there as soon as I let out the clutch with each gear, something that doesn't happen unless you powershift a turbo car.

Originally Posted by Drewstein

Who's a 135mph car? I'm not unless you're talking about the 1/8th. Well honestly that's too high in the 8th but it's good internet trash talk.

I have no problems with 1k hp cars in my Camaro.

I'll be at No Fly Zone to prove it in October as well. I was also out in Mexico last night and had no problems with the cars out there even in 109* heat.

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN

What size compressor inducer is required for 900whp? At a glance a D1 with a 85mm inducer rated at 900hp isn't really all that impressive compared to the turbo outputs of that size. An F1 with a 95mm inducer rated at 1050hp is fairly lackluster compared to a turbo of that size. For comparison a smaller 80mm inducer turbo will easily make 900whp and a 94mm will make north of 1400.

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN

But on the same idea boost isn't as RPM dependent on a turbo car. You don't have to rev out a turbo car for full boost like a centrifugal blower. Someone here did a back to back test from Procharger to turbo and full boost was available ~3k RPM's earlier in the RPM range.

Originally Posted by Game ova

He was talking about my car. Basically, because my car is slow.....I know nothing about a gtr. Frankly, I've grown to hate those letters of the alphabet. Gtr gets drug into every conversation about cars, usually by people that worship them.

Originally Posted by Drewstein

Yeah true, I mentioned them and whoooosh! the nut swingers flew in.

I don't understand the attraction for the modding crew, maybe AWD? They're the EVO kids all grown up I guess. They're not a great platform for speed as the $$ per MPH is through the roof with them. From a cool factor I'd take a Lambo, C6Z or Viper over a GTR. For speed I bought a catfish because modding even my old C5 or C6 was a PITA compared to it.

My point above is with a procharger you're not hanging with those 1k cars and a simple turbo setup has me laying waste to them. The higher you go, turbos make more sense. I loved my procharged C5, but it couldn't hang with todays cars. Want mid 6xx rwhp? procharge it. Want more? Turbo it.