Mach at the track
#1662
Keep making excuses for why the GM product makes more power. You can say my car has more displacement, then I'll argue "well, your car has four cams and four valves per cylinder!".
Also, Fwiw an LS3 and 5.0 will make in the same area for power with the same blower/psi.
What would be more interesting is seeing how a built N/A 5.0 would stack up to a similarly modded N/A LS3. My $ on the LS3.
Also, Fwiw an LS3 and 5.0 will make in the same area for power with the same blower/psi.
What would be more interesting is seeing how a built N/A 5.0 would stack up to a similarly modded N/A LS3. My $ on the LS3.
#1663
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
https://ls1tech.com/forums/gen-5-cam...3-h-c-ls1.html
The car made a consistent 426-428rwhp/408rwtq when hot after consecutive pulls.
My car made 415/398 baseline before the tune (with all mods of coarse). thought I would throw that in.
Car did very good. Best pull was 435rwhp and 418rwtq. From another thread by same poster
My car made 415/398 baseline before the tune (with all mods of coarse). thought I would throw that in.
Car did very good. Best pull was 435rwhp and 418rwtq. From another thread by same poster
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...-454-rwhp.html
Has a meth kit though...and I guess higher octane from reading a bit further down (91 plus some additive).
#1665
Quick search.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/gen-5-cam...3-h-c-ls1.html
---------
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...-454-rwhp.html
Has a meth kit though...and I guess higher octane from reading a bit further down (91 plus some additive).
https://ls1tech.com/forums/gen-5-cam...3-h-c-ls1.html
---------
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...-454-rwhp.html
Has a meth kit though...and I guess higher octane from reading a bit further down (91 plus some additive).
Here read this instead of Corvetteworld. http://www.summitracing.com/
Cause if you don't in a few months, I'mma chop them doors off.
#1666
#1667
TECH Enthusiast
http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...boss-sema.html
that is the boss 6.2. its available in the raptor and makes 500hp all motor and stock.
that is the boss 6.2. its available in the raptor and makes 500hp all motor and stock.
#1668
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
WTF is going on in here?
Some random facts:
1. LS6 motor can easily make 800rwhp with 16-18lbs of boost, if you have the right supercharger.
2. People have made 740+rwhp on the stock LS6 short block and it has lasted for years. Some have had theirs blow up at 500rwhp in months. It's all a gamble and based on how they drive it and the tuner (BIG factor).
3. You could say size the blower to the motor, but sizing it for your power goals is a better idea. Its about efficiency. What's the sense in over spinning a little Vortech Si-Trim with a ridiculous 18lbs of boost when you could run a big YSi at much lower boost for the same power?
Some random facts:
1. LS6 motor can easily make 800rwhp with 16-18lbs of boost, if you have the right supercharger.
2. People have made 740+rwhp on the stock LS6 short block and it has lasted for years. Some have had theirs blow up at 500rwhp in months. It's all a gamble and based on how they drive it and the tuner (BIG factor).
3. You could say size the blower to the motor, but sizing it for your power goals is a better idea. Its about efficiency. What's the sense in over spinning a little Vortech Si-Trim with a ridiculous 18lbs of boost when you could run a big YSi at much lower boost for the same power?
Do you think GM would've used the same blower if they had intended it to run at the boost levels of the 13 GT500?
I can say my 5.0 modular forged motor would make near 700whp on 10 psi through a novi 2200. Thats with the boss intake. Prob hit 700 with the cobra jet. My motor is also 11:1 and makes a good bit of power without boost. With the exception of the ls7... i dont think any stock longblock would make that power on 10lbs. Unless its turbo...but i too would make more with a turbo setup.
With said it would probably need a bigger blower.....probably a 2.6 because it will be moving more air.
Just as the 4.6 vs ls6 originally got all blowed up on here. So now it's either Heater's blower is to big and not operating in it's efficiency zone or the ls6 will make the same or more power on less boost....But at the same boost levels it would and should require a larger blower.
To all who bashed be in this thread.......I'll take your apologies now.
#1669
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The downfall of that motor is how big and heavy it is, the upside from what I remember is it is based on a 4.5" bore centers.
If Ford wanted to get serious with that engine, it could be a serious piece. Roush took one and played with it and got 427 c.I out of it and 700 HP. They named it the 777, for 7 liters-700 HP at 7000 rpms
Roush put it in Don Bowles NMRA car and it ran low 9's on motor.
If Ford wanted to get serious with that engine, it could be a serious piece. Roush took one and played with it and got 427 c.I out of it and 700 HP. They named it the 777, for 7 liters-700 HP at 7000 rpms
Roush put it in Don Bowles NMRA car and it ran low 9's on motor.
#1671
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
You should be worrying more about getting your car out of the 13's
Here read this instead of Corvetteworld. http://www.summitracing.com/
Cause if you don't in a few months, I'mma chop them doors off.
Here read this instead of Corvetteworld. http://www.summitracing.com/
Cause if you don't in a few months, I'mma chop them doors off.
#1674
There has been several make over 600 at less boost than Heaters.
I was ask you ....
Do you think GM would've used the same blower if they had intended it to run at the boost levels of the 13 GT500?
I never said the same blower......I don't care about that. Read above
Old modular no....new 5.0/5.8 maybe a bit more. After the updated LT1 comes out to match or exceed the updated modulars and your back to sucking hind tit.
This......now your gettin warm
DING ...DING....DING...DING looks like we may have a winner.
No one cares about your boss in every thread. Maybe we'll get a chance to get together so I can smoke that thing for ya.
Winner!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The problem is it would need a larger blower to stay in it's efficiency zone then because it would be well over 700hp. I'll go back to this question.....Do you think GM would've used the same blower if they had intended it to run at the boost levels of the 13 GT500?
With said it would probably need a bigger blower.....probably a 2.6 because it will be moving more air.
Just as the 4.6 vs ls6 originally got all blowed up on here. So now it's either Heater's blower is to big and not operating in it's efficiency zone or the ls6 will make the same or more power on less boost....But at the same boost levels it would and should require a larger blower.
To all who bashed be in this thread.......I'll take your apologies now.
I was ask you ....
Do you think GM would've used the same blower if they had intended it to run at the boost levels of the 13 GT500?
I never said the same blower......I don't care about that. Read above
Old modular no....new 5.0/5.8 maybe a bit more. After the updated LT1 comes out to match or exceed the updated modulars and your back to sucking hind tit.
This......now your gettin warm
DING ...DING....DING...DING looks like we may have a winner.
No one cares about your boss in every thread. Maybe we'll get a chance to get together so I can smoke that thing for ya.
Winner!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The problem is it would need a larger blower to stay in it's efficiency zone then because it would be well over 700hp. I'll go back to this question.....Do you think GM would've used the same blower if they had intended it to run at the boost levels of the 13 GT500?
With said it would probably need a bigger blower.....probably a 2.6 because it will be moving more air.
Just as the 4.6 vs ls6 originally got all blowed up on here. So now it's either Heater's blower is to big and not operating in it's efficiency zone or the ls6 will make the same or more power on less boost....But at the same boost levels it would and should require a larger blower.
To all who bashed be in this thread.......I'll take your apologies now.
So you are saying that a larger displacement engine, with a larger blower will make more power than a smaller displacement engine with a smaller blower?... Thank you captain obvious.
#1678
You DO understand that GM is BEHIND the curve right? The new LT1 coming out I am sure will be trumped by what Ford will be releasing in 15'
#1679
Launching!
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Or rather, FTL!
I dont know about that. Whatever motor GM has planned for the upcoming Z06 and ZR1 should be more than enough to match what Ford puts out.
#1680
Yeah I for once would like to see one that's not a shop car duplicate those numbers. The Coyote has been out for 3 years now and only a couple tuner shops have accomplished numbers like that, compared to various cam-only LS3's in the high 400's to 500 mark and multiple 550+ LS3 strokers that were around within a few years after the LS3's introduction - privately owned cars. I think the LS3 dominates in that category.
Or rather, FTL!
I dont know about that. Whatever motor GM has planned for the upcoming Z06 and ZR1 should be more than enough to match what Ford puts out.
Or rather, FTL!
I dont know about that. Whatever motor GM has planned for the upcoming Z06 and ZR1 should be more than enough to match what Ford puts out.